Jussie Smollett, once at the center of a national scandal, is now free of the legal consequences tied to his conviction for orchestrating a hate crime hoax in 2019. The Illinois Supreme Court has overturned the former Empire actor’s 2021 conviction, ruling that prosecutors violated his rights when they pursued charges after an initial agreement to dismiss the case.
The court’s decision, issued Thursday, centers on the original deal Smollett struck with Cook County prosecutors. That agreement required him to forfeit his $10,000 bond and complete community service in exchange for the dismissal of charges related to his claims of being attacked by two men shouting racial and homophobic slurs. Smollett fulfilled his end of the deal, completing 18 hours of volunteer work. However, after public backlash over the dropped charges, a special prosecutor reopened the case, leading to his conviction for filing false police reports.
In its opinion, the court stated, “The State is bound by the agreements it makes with defendants.” It further noted that allowing prosecutors to backtrack on deals would undermine trust in the criminal justice system.
READ: Jussie Smollett’s New Film ‘The Lost Holliday’ Set for September Release in Select Theaters [VIDEO]
Smollett’s saga began in January 2019, when he told Chicago police that two men assaulted him, shouted, “This is MAGA country,” and placed a noose around his neck. His account initially garnered widespread support and condemnation of the alleged attack.
However, investigations revealed that Smollett had paid two brothers, Abimbola and Olabinjo Osundairo, to stage the incident. Authorities argued that the hoax was an attempt to gain media attention and sympathy, though Smollett consistently denied those claims.
In 2021, Smollett was convicted of felony disorderly conduct and sentenced to 150 days in jail, 30 months of probation, and $130,000 in restitution to cover police resources used in the investigation. He was released pending appeal and never served the jail sentence.
Smollett’s legal team welcomed the Supreme Court’s ruling. His attorney, Nenye Uche, described the case as a “vindictive prosecution” and stated, “This was not a prosecution based on facts. It was about politics and optics.”
Notably, the Supreme Court did not address the underlying allegations of the hoax but focused on the State’s obligation to honor its initial agreement. This ruling means Smollett cannot be retried for these charges.
The decision has sparked comparisons to other high-profile cases involving prosecutorial misconduct, including Bill Cosby’s release after his conviction was overturned due to a similar breach of a legal agreement. Critics argue that such reversals highlight inconsistencies in the criminal justice system, while supporters believe they protect defendants’ rights.
While Smollett’s legal battle may be over, the case remains a flashpoint for discussions about truth, justice, and accountability in the public sphere. For Smollett, the ruling marks a legal victory, but questions about the incident—and its impact on his career—continue to loom large.